TTAB Refuses Registration of TWA Marks by Non-Profit Aviation Education Company

Although TWA stopped flying more than a decade ago, American Airlines (which purchased TWA in 2001) still owns trademark registrations for TWA covering model airplanes.  The TTAB recently found that those registrations were sufficient to prevent another company from registering the TWA mark for air transportation services.

The Applicant was a non-profit that provides experiential learning programs aboard restored TWA aircraft.  It sought to register the following marks for “air transportation of passengers and freight”:

Globe Design MarkWork Mark

               Globe design mark                               Word mark in stylized form

The PTO refused registration citing American Airlines’ prior  registrations for the word mark TWA and the following three design marks, all covering model airplanes:
Airplane_1Airplane_2 Airplane_3

The Board affirmed the refusal on the ground a likelihood of confusion exists.  In particular, with respect to the similarity of the parties’ goods and services, the Board was persuaded by evidence showing that a number of major airlines sell model airplanes through the same websites that customers use to book flights.

Although Applicant argued that no likelihood of confusion exists because the purpose of its air transportation services was “for the purposes of education and historical preservation,” the Board rejected this argument because such limitation was not present in the identification.  It does not appear that Applicant ever attempted to register the TWA mark for its primary educational services.

The case highlights that, in some circumstances, trademark owners no longer using a mark in connection with the original product/service may be able to extend their protection in the mark by offering collateral products.   Also, when applying to register a mark, applicants should take care to limit their identification to the primary services offered—especially when they are aware of potential obstacles.  In this case, had the Applicant sought registration for educational services, the result may have been different.

The case is In re TriStar History and Preservation Inc., Serial Nos. 86078454 and 86111943 (TTAB Sept. 3, 2015).

DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.

Tagged , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: