USPTO Proposes Reduction in Trademark Fees

Author: Naresh Kilaru

In what should be regarded as welcome news for trademark owners, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has announced that it is considering fee reductions for certain trademark applications and renewals filed online.

In a notice of proposed rulemaking that issued on May 9, 2014, the PTO proposed reducing fees as follows:

  • $325 to $275 per class for applications filed under Section 1 or Section 44 of the Lanham Act, if (1) the application is filed through the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) and (2) applicants agree to receive all communications by e-mail and file all responses and other documents through TEAS during the prosecution of the application.  This option would be known as a TEAS Reduced Fee application.
  • $275 to $225 per class for a TEAS Plus application if the applicant files through TEAS and agrees to electronic communication. A TEAS Plus application is where an applicant selects its description of goods/services from the PTO’s Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual.
  • $400 to $300 per class for a TEAS application for renewal of a registration.

The reduced fee option will not be available to applications filed via the Madrid Protocol, since such applications cannot be filed through TEAS. Also, the filing fee of $375 per class for applications filed on paper and the filing fee of $400 per class for renewal of a registration filed on paper will not change.

According to the PTO, the proposed reductions are intended to promote efficiency for both the PTO and its customers through increased electronic communication. Among other things, the PTO has found that filing through TEAS and authorizing email communication expedites processing, shortens pendency, and minimizes manual processing and the potential for data entry errors.


DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.

Tagged , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: